Defer replacements without carrying the risk by showing which condemned structures still hold their rated load, and the conditions under which they stop.
Asset Management
Replace the structures that need replacing, defer the ones that don't, and show the load calculation behind every call.
Judge every asset on what it can carry, not how old it is
Install dates and inspection grades describe the past. Model each structure against its real geometry, attachments, and local weather to see which ones still hold, and which are already past their rated load.
Rank replacement candidates by measured load so the 2011 pole carrying an unrated fifth attachment outranks the 1969 pole standing in firm ground.
Prove the structures you're deferring still hold with a load case per pole and the conditions it fails under, not a sampled field grade and a signature.
Find the poles your GIS never recorded by reconciling LiDAR against your records, so you stop maintaining a network you only partly know.
The problem
Age tells you when an asset is due, not whether it will hold
Install date, last inspection grade, and failure history all describe the past. None of them answers whether a structure carries its current load through a 90 mph gust. So condition indices get built, weighted, and defended, while the question underneath stays open:
- A 1969 pole in firm ground carrying two attachments, condemned on age alone
- A 2011 pole carrying a fifth attachment it was never rated for, passed on age alone
- A pole missing from GIS, inspected by nobody, on a cycle no one owns
You end up replacing sound structures on schedule while the ones that actually fail stay in service.
Then the regulator asks why this volume, at this cost, and the answer is a methodology rather than a calculation.
From replacing on schedule to replacing on evidence
Make asset calls you can put in front of a regulator
When every pole, crossarm, and attachment sits in one structural model, you can defend what you replace, what you defer, and what you leave alone.
Send crews where the model points, not where the cycle points cutting truck rolls to poles that were always fine and catching the ones no inspection route covers.
Know how much load every pole can still take before you approve the next attachment, reconductor, or capacity increase on that span.
Hand over the calculation, not the conclusion with load cases, weather assumptions, and measured geometry traceable behind every structure in the filing.
Real-world applications
Cutting $5M a year from asset inspection spend
Pole loading analysis across 2 million poles
Doubling capacity without building a single new line
From describing asset condition to calculating it
Explore all workflows
See your network as one physics-enabled digital twin
Book a personalized demo and see how leading utilities defend every replacement, deferral, and inspection decision.