Distinguish BAU risk from consequential customer impact by spotting where conditions combine into failure exposure, even when assets look stable.
Resiliency & Reliability
Understand the customer impact of interacting risks across the network, and prioritize actions based on physics-backed outcomes
Improve system-level resiliency, not just individual asset risk
Prioritize mitigation work based on how asset condition and behavior, vegetation proximity, and environmental conditions interact across the network in every scenario.
Show which feeders need hardening most and why
Prove hardening work lifts system resiliency, not just shifts risk
Know how risk, spend, and response plans change under each scenario
The problem
Most resiliency programs evaluate risks in isolation, but failures emerge at the network level
Vegetation teams look at trees, engineering teams look at loading, emergency teams look at response. The silos are logical. The problem is that HILF events don't respect them. Failures come from conditions interacting across the network, not from a single threshold crossed in a single place:
- Vegetation falling at just the right angle on an already over‑utilized pole
- Trimming in a windy corridor that unintentionally increases exposure and failure risk nearby
- A hardened pole that simply shifts mechanical stress to adjacent spans
You can have a perfect lens into vegetation, structure loading, and accessibility risk, and still have a very limited understanding of actual network resiliency.
Mitigation work can successfully reduce individual risk vectors while leaving the overall resiliency and reliability risk profile largely unchanged.
From localized risk mitigation to network-wide outcome modeling
Ask the whole network, not just the slice you can see
Make resiliency decisions based on modeled consequences
Anticipate second and third-order consequences from prevention to restoration, seeing how layered risks shape crew access and where failures escalate.
Justify investments with simulation analyses tied to auditable scenario results that prove hardening reduced risk rather than moved it.
Build back faster and better with engineering-grade guardrails that keep frontline decisions safe and compliant under pressure.
Real-world applications
Storm Arwen backcast and remediation comparison
Winter Storm Fern backcast: connecting hardening investments to customer benefits
From ‘worst-performing feeder’-based investment to a physics-backed risk score
From approximated visualization to precise simulated behavior
Explore all workflows
See your network as one physics-enabled digital twin
Book a personalized demo and discover how leading utilities are transforming their operations.