Report: Why public perception poses a threat to a resilient Net Zero energy transition
Summary
A number of major obstacles line the UK’s path to Net Zero. From energy security risks linked to global conflicts and the rise in extreme weather, to aging grid infrastructure and a sharp increase in energy demand. But another critical obstacle often goes overlooked: public perception.
Public opposition to clean energy initiatives is increasingly becoming a major barrier in the UK. Wavering public support and the rise of ‘Not-in-my-backyard’ (NIMBY) attitudes are slowing momentum and harming national Net Zero progress.
Building a better understanding of public concerns and proactively engaging with communities on Net Zero will be a crucial step for utilities, regulators and government officials, if we are to accelerate progress in the next few years. People rightly want their voices to be heard. Leaders have a responsibility to listen and take action accordingly.
Investigating public perception of Net Zero
Neara set out to investigate the current public perception of energy utilities and Net Zero efforts in the UK. Across a number of studies conducted in 2024, we surveyed thousands of people living in the UK to get their views on:
- 1. Speed of reconnection following extreme weather events
- 2. Appetite for clean energy projects
- 3. The role of AI in supporting Net Zero efforts
The findings were eye-opening. Overall, the data revealed that current public perception around Net Zero and clean energy is deeply fragmented. Some of the key findings show that among the British public:
- – 1 in 3 expect power to be restored 48x faster than the current Ofgem guidelines
- – 1 in 4 say power cuts are rising, having become more frequent in their area over the past five years
- – People are twice as likely to support new pylons if they are built for clean energy
- – 2 in 5 people (41%) would be willing to pay higher prices if their energy was reliably renewable
- – Over 40% believe that AI and technology will have a positive impact on climate action
- – More than 1 in 3 (35.7%) believe that AI and other technological solutions will enhance energy security and resilience
Tackling division with communication
Public perception holds power when it comes to driving Net Zero progress. Any division must be tackled with clear, effective communication from industry leaders, government and utilities. This is absolutely critical to unlocking a cleaner energy future.
Read on to access the full report for a deeper analysis of the data, including regional and generational variations in attitudes, an overview of exactly how leaders can begin to enhance engagement with the public on Net Zero, and the role technology has to play in building public trust in new initiatives.
Read on for the full report:
Introduction: UK Net Zero – progress, challenges, and the role of public perception
As the international deadline for Net Zero draws ever closer, and we increasingly see the effects of climate change impacting communities across the globe, leaders around the world are facing increased pressure to demonstrate action and show movement towards a cleaner energy society.
Amid this global movement, the UK is doubling down on its efforts to become a ‘clean energy superpower’, striving to lead on Net Zero progress and establish itself as a significant player in the green transition.
A change in government in July 2024 saw the introduction of the Great British Energy Bill. This watershed bill aims to establish a publicly-owned energy organisation focused primarily on driving the UK’s clean energy progress: increasing renewables generation, improving energy security and efficiency, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Alongside its commitment to reaching Net Zero by 2050, the UK government has also outlined a number of additional clean energy targets over the past few years.
At COP29, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unveiled the UK’s new nationally determined contribution (NDC) target (part of the Paris Agreement) which commits to reducing “all greenhouse gas emissions by at least 81% by 2035, compared to 1990 levels”.
A series of successive carbon budgets have also been set, which limits emissions within each carbon budgetary period. The current period is the fourth to date and aims for a “52% reduction in emissions by 2027”.
Signs of progress
Promising signals have been received which demonstrate some of the positive impacts the UK’s net zero efforts are achieving.
A report commissioned by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) in February 2025 found that the UK’s net zero sector had grown 10% year-on-year. This translated into a significant £83bn boost to the economy and accounted for almost 951,000 jobs (2.9% of the UK’s total employment).
In July 2024, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) noted some progress in the UK’s efforts to achieve its decarbonisation and emissions targets. It found that emissions (excluding those from aviation and shipping) had more than halved since 1990 and that the UK had met all of its three carbon budgets to date.
Despite these positive indicators, the overall consensus is that much more needs to be done to ensure that the UK remains on track to reach its ambitious, and crucial, Net Zero targets.
Obstacles blocking the road to Net Zero
Energy utilities and industry leaders are working tirelessly to innovate and find new solutions to help accelerate progress and drive the UK closer to reaching its green energy goals.
However, a number of obstacles remain which threaten to stall these efforts and even rewind Britain’s clean energy progress, including:
- – Energy security concerns linked to global conflicts
- – The rising impact of climate change and extreme weather
- – Aging infrastructure and a lack of renewables capacity
- – Increased energy demand – and AI’s intensive energy consumption
Alongside these challenges, there is one critical issue that often gets overlooked: public perception.
As the UK works toward its Net Zero targets, public opposition to clean energy initiatives is increasingly becoming a major barrier. Despite ongoing government and industry efforts, wavering public support and the rise of ‘Not-in-My-Backyard’ (NIMBY) attitudes are slowing progress toward green energy goals.
As the government pushes forward with plans to expand clean energy infrastructure, it faces mounting resistance from local communities concerned about the impact on their surroundings, livelihoods, and daily lives. This growing opposition is a significant roadblock to achieving a resilient and sustainable Net Zero transition.
Nimbyism and the power of public opinion
Residents up and down the UK are understandably concerned over the sudden influx of new energy infrastructure proposals, such as the 370,000 miles of new power lines and pylons estimated to be needed in pursuit of Net Zero targets.
Among objections are the impact that new energy infrastructure could have on the local landscape, as well as fears over the effect on house values and the impact on people’s daily lives.
These concerns are fuelling a rise in co-ordinated action and legal challenges from local residents and campaigners, which are stalling planning permission and slowing the progress of new renewable energy infrastructure.
Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly spoken out on the issue, vowing to stop campaigners’ efforts to stall planning progress for new infrastructure projects.
However, meeting fire with fire stands to only intensify public opposition and nurture growing discontent among energy consumers. Attention must shift towards engaging with the public on energy and Net Zero issues and striving to achieve a mutual solution.
Prioritising public perception
Engaging with and properly understanding public perception is absolutely crucial for energy utilities, regulators and government officials, if we are to unblock the road to Net Zero and accelerate progress.
A consistent theme within opposition to clean energy plans is that people feel as though their voices are not being heard. People rightly want their concerns to be listened to, taken seriously, and considered within plans that will undoubtedly affect their lives and local areas.
The disconnect between public opinion and those in power who are leading clean energy efforts must be bridged if we are to establish an effective route toward Net Zero.
At Neara, we set out to investigate the current public perception of energy utilities and Net Zero efforts in the UK. We wanted to understand where the true pain points lie and how industry leaders can go about addressing and overcoming these within their communities.
Over the course of multiple studies conducted in 2024, we surveyed thousands of people living in the UK to get their views on:
- 1. Speed of reconnection following extreme weather events
- 2. Appetite for clean energy projects
- 3. The role of AI in supporting Net Zero efforts
Through our findings, we hope to highlight the importance of public perception in driving clean energy progress. We believe that as an industry, we must work together to engage with consumers, address opposition and build the collective support needed to achieve our ambitious, but vital, Net Zero goals.
The findings: research into public perception of the UK’s clean energy efforts
- 1. Reconnection following extreme weather: the expectation gap
As climate change gathers pace, the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is increasing across the UK. Strong winds, flooding, heavy rainfall and wildfire all pose a significant risk to energy infrastructure and often lead to power outages for households and businesses. For example, during Storm Eowyn in January 2025, more than 1 million consumers were left without power across the UK.
According to Ofgem guidelines, utilities should be aiming to restore power to properties that become disconnected within 12 hours during normal conditions and 48 hours during extreme weather events.
However, our research uncovered an acute discrepancy between these recommendations and the speed at which the public expect their electricity to be reconnected.
1 in 3 expect power to be restored 48x faster than current guidelines
According to a survey of 2000 UK adults commissioned by Neara in November 2024, 1 in 3 people (31%) living in the UK believe that utility companies should restore power within 1-2 hours following a severe storm. This is 48x faster than the Ofgem guideline.
A further 1 in 4 respondents (24%) expect power to be restored within 3-5 hours. Only a tiny percentage (4%) of respondents said they would expect it to take more than a day for power to come back online.
These findings highlight a significant gap between public expectation and the reality of restoration timelines during major weather events. Power restoration can involve complex challenges for engineers amongst often dangerous conditions, particularly if a storm is still ongoing, or further harsh conditions are expected.
The expectation gap can damage consumer trust while piling additional pressure on utilities that are already facing unprecedented challenges. Addressing public perception and engaging with consumers about the impact of climate change on energy infrastructure is critical. We need to improve communication, reset expectations and rebuild trust, so that both utilities and consumers are supported as we continue to adapt to the impact of fast-evolving climate conditions on the grid.
1 in 4 say power cuts are rising
Our research also revealed that 1 in 4 respondents believe power cuts have become more frequent in their area over the past five years (27%).
Nearly a third of all respondents (31%) felt the frequency of power outages had remained the same, while 16% believed they had decreased.
Across all respondents, Londoners were the most likely to report an increase in outages (37%), while those in Northern Ireland were the least likely (20%).
Existing variations in energy infrastructure across the UK may be partly responsible for this regional disparity, with certain areas experiencing a higher number of outages to begin with. The data points to a need to address this imbalance in energy supply and infrastructure health. Levelling up across the grid will have a key role to play in driving equitable climate protection and energy security.
Praise for communication from utilities
Despite disparities in perception of power cut frequency and expectations for rapid restoration, respondents were generally satisfied with how utilities communicate with them during outages.
The majority (52%) said their utility company communicates “very well” or “quite well” during power outages. Similarly, 45% of people felt that utilities restore power quickly.
When asked where they would turn for accurate, real-time information during a power cut, a quarter (24.8%) of respondents said they would rely on their utility company or energy provider. Only 13% were unsure where to turn or had no specific source for accurate information during a power cut.
When it comes to the impact of extreme weather on the grid, and the frequency and handling of outages, a level of discrepancy remains between public perception and the realities utilities face. Prioritising communication with consumers is key to maintaining trust, rebalancing expectations, and reducing pressure on engineers. This means delivering greater public education on the role utilities play – from who is responsible for each stage of the energy infrastructure to what it actually takes to get power back online. It also relies on stronger signposting of resources that people can turn to for advice and support when affected by power outages. Communication must further extend to building greater awareness of the role each of us can play as individuals in combating the impact of climate change on the grid.
- 2. Public appetite for clean energy: who cares?
Increasing the generation and use of renewable energy across the UK is a key factor in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving Net Zero. This cannot be done without some changes for consumers – from the introduction of new energy infrastructure in their local area to changes in energy pricing. Understanding current public perception of these factors is crucial for utilities to be able to drive renewables progress and avoid opposition.
Building new energy infrastructure
We set out to understand how the UK public really feels about green energy infrastructure being built in their backyard. A survey of 2,000 UK adults conducted on behalf of Neara by Censuswide in May 2024 allowed us to draw a clear picture of public perception and analyse regional and generational differences.
Public pylon support doubles if built for clean energy
The research revealed that people are twice as likely to support the installation of new pylons close to their home if they know it would unlock access to more sustainable, renewable energy.
- – When asked how supportive or opposed they would feel if a new pylon was installed within a two-minute walk of their home, just 1 in 10 (12%) respondents said they would be supportive.
- – However, this number more than doubles to 1 in 4 (26%) respondents confirming they would be supportive of new pylons if assured the infrastructure would increase clean energy transmission. This represents a 117% increase in support.
The finding suggests that the importance of green initiatives holds weight within the public consciousness and has a notable impact on attitudes and support for new energy infrastructure. However, the size of this support still varies.
Support for clean infrastructure varies by region
In every region of the UK, the number of respondents in support of new pylons increases when they are told the installation will boost clean energy transmission. However, the overall level of support for pylons varies from region to region:
- – The biggest increase in support when respondents were informed of the new pylons’ clean energy purpose was found in Yorkshire and the Humber
- – In this region, the percentage of people who were pro-pylon rose from 9% to 31% – a rise of 244%
- – Respondents living in Greater London showed the highest initial support for new pylons (15%)
- – This rises to 23% of London-based respondents (an increase of 53%) when they are told that the pylons would unlock more renewable energy

Older residents show biggest increase in support
Region is not the only variable that impacts public support for pylons. There is also significant variation in responses based on age.
- – The biggest increase in support for pylons when built for clean energy was shown by respondents aged 55+, rising 188% (from 8% to 23% supportive of new infrastructure)
- – This was closely followed by Gen Z, with those aged 16-24 showing a 158% rise in support (from 12% to 31%) when the pylons were intended for clean energy transmission
- – The lowest rise in support came from those aged 35-44 (71%+) and 25-34 (78%+)
- – However, those aged 25-34 showed the highest overall support for pylons, at 18%, rising to 32% when told they would enable more clean energy

1 in 3 Brits on the fence
While the number of people in support of new pylons increases across the board when the clean energy benefits are communicated, a significant proportion of the British public remain ‘neutral’.
43% of respondents initially claimed that they would feel neutral about a new pylon being installed near their home. This fell to 37% when told the pylon would be built for the purpose of increasing renewable energy transmission.
Regardless of the clean energy benefits, more than 1 in 3 Brits would neither support nor object to the installation of new energy infrastructure.
41% of British households willing to pay more for ‘green’ energy
To further understand the impact of clean energy on consumer attitudes, we ran an additional survey of 2,000 UK adults in November 2024 to ask how willing people would be to pay more for their household energy if it was guaranteed to come from renewable or ‘green’ sources.
Two in five people (41%) said that they would be willing to pay higher prices if their energy was reliably renewable.
However, while the survey pointed to an encouraging level of support for clean power among consumers, opposition and uncertainty still remains. Around three in five respondents (59%) said that they would be either opposed to (48%) or unsure about (11%) the idea of absorbing extra costs to gain access to green energy.

Attitudes toward the cost of clean energy shift with age
As with attitudes to the building of green infrastructure in residential areas, opinions on cost presented a clear generational divide.
Among 18-24 year-olds, a significant 64% say they would be happy to pay higher energy bills if the supply came from renewable sources, compared with just 21% amongst the over-55s.
A majority of people aged 18-44 were willing to pay more for green energy, while those aged 45-54 and 55+ displayed a higher rate of objection to the idea.
Sustainability trumps reliability when it comes to cost
Our research also sought to compare public attitudes towards energy reliability vs. sustainability.
When asked whether they would be willing to pay extra for a more reliable energy supply, 1 in 3 respondents (34%) said yes, compared to the 41% of people who say they would be willing to pay more for greener energy. This is despite more than more than 1 in 4 (27%) reporting an increase in power cuts in their local area over the last five years.
Across both studies, there is a clear signal that public appetite for renewable energy and the infrastructure needed to manage it is alive and kicking. Our findings suggest that the communication of energy projects’ green credentials can notably improve public support. The challenge is ensuring that this communication happens in an effective, coordinated manner. People need to know why new infrastructure is needed, how utilities are working to avoid disruption, and what the overarching clean energy benefits will be. Plotting pylons without proper public engagement will simply fan the flames of opposition and continue to block the path to Net Zero.
- 3. AI’s role in the clean energy transition – attitudes and assumptions
Public optimism about AI’s impact on the clean energy transition
While concerns about AI’s environmental impact, particularly its carbon footprint and the strain it may place on the energy grid, remain, our research finds that a significant proportion of the UK public is optimistic about AI’s potential to support the green energy transition.
In a survey of 2,000 UK adults conducted in November 2024, we asked what impact people believed AI and technology will have on climate efforts.
Over 40% of respondents say they believe that AI and technology will have a positive impact on climate action.
Meanwhile, only 5% view these innovations as detrimental. The remaining respondents are divided, with 26% perceiving technology as having a limited effect and 28% uncertain.
These findings point to a broad recognition of AI’s potential within the green energy transition, reflecting the UK government’s ongoing efforts to integrate these technologies into the energy sector. Public sentiment aligns with initiatives like the AI Opportunities Action Plan, which focuses on using AI to help the UK meet its clean energy goals.

Younger people more confident in AI
Support for AI’s role in the clean energy transition is significantly higher among younger generations. Over 56% of 18-44-year-olds believe that AI and technology will benefit the transition, while only 30% of those aged 45 and above share the same view.
The generational divide in attitudes points to a need for greater education and communication on the role of AI in climate action. We need to ensure that people understand the challenges and benefits AI presents and how it can contribute to reaching climate goals, both now and in the future.
Geography and gender demonstrate further division
Attitudes toward AI’s role in the clean energy transition also differ based on geography and gender.
Regionally, Londoners are the most positive, with the majority (55%) believing AI will have a beneficial impact. In contrast, respondents from Scotland are the least likely to share this view, with only 33.6% seeing AI as beneficial for the clean energy transition.
Men demonstrate more confidence in AI’s ability to contribute positively to climate action than women. 46% of men say they believe that AI and technology will support the clean energy transition, compared to 37% of women.
1 in 3 believe AI and technology will enhance energy security
Aside from its overall impact on climate action, more than 1 in 3 (35.7%) people in the UK believe that AI and other technological solutions will enhance energy security and resilience.
When broken down by gender, 42.17% of men believe AI and other technologies will improve energy security and resilience, compared to just 29.52% of women.
However, 12% of the public remain concerned, believing that AI could weaken energy security and resilience to some extent.
While AI development is moving at a seemingly exponential rate, and driving increasing applications within climate tech, public confidence in the role of AI in the space remains split. It is encouraging to see that 40% of the population already recognise the potential of AI in helping us tackle climate challenges. But we have considerable work to do to improve support among the remaining 3 in 5 who remain uncertain about AI’s place in the green transition.
Conclusion: Prioritising communication to nurture public support for climate progress
Public perception matters. Whether it’s how supported residents feel during increasingly severe climate events, the importance they attribute to clean energy infrastructure, or their belief in the power of digital innovation to secure Net Zero goals; it’s more than just personal opinion. Collectively, public perception on these issues can determine the power that government and industry leaders have to deliver a successful clean energy transition.
Our data suggests that right now, this perception is deeply fragmented. There is significant regional and demographic variation in attitudes across all areas, including extreme weather response, clean energy infrastructure, and the risk vs. reward of AI in helping meet evolving power needs.
Tackling this division requires clearer, more effective communication from industry leaders, government and utilities. While the negative stories, such as energy-draining data centres and picture imperfect pylons, will continue to grab headlines, we need to ensure they are countered with clearer communication of the benefits that these new technologies and infrastructure, when implemented in the right ways, can bring.
First of all, we must acknowledge that not all AI is made equal. Its overall consumption on a global scale is certainly problematic, but certain applications can help us to boost energy efficiency and sustainability. For example, when thoughtfully combined with applied physics, it can drive more accurate, evidence-based decisions that improve our energy infrastructure and reduce climate impact. It’s all about how the technology is used. Communicating this to consumers is a crucial element of building support for Net Zero innovation.
We can use the technology itself to help deliver this communication. For example, physics-enabled digital modelling can enable us to:
- – Simulate the impact of extreme weather on the grid, highlighting the steps that must be taken to prevent future outages
- – Evidence the need for grid upgrades and developments, and identify areas where latent capacity can help reduce unnecessary new construction
- – Model the impact of future energy demands on the grid to assess the viability of new infrastructure proposals (such as rolling out air conditioning to UK homes)
Prioritising effective, consistent, and transparent communication that connects directly with the public and enhances trust will be essential for policy leaders and utilities alike to help accelerate the path to Net Zero. Embracing new technologies, like AI and physics-enabled digital modelling, can help to build the foundation for this communication – providing the data, insights, and predictive analysis needed to demonstrate the scale of the challenges at hand and garner support for the projects working to overcome them.